IN BRIEF: '10 out of 10': What is known about three-hour summit between #Putin, #Trump
The two leaders refrained from answering questions and then briefly conversed on their feet.


#Russian President Vladimir Putin and his #US counterpart Donald Trump have concluded their meeting in #Anchorage, #Alaska. They spoke for nearly three hours in the presence of their foreign ministers and aides.

Then, Putin and Trump made statements to the media. They refrained from answering questions and then briefly conversed on their feet. Afterwards, Putin laid flowers at the graves of Soviet pilots buried in Anchorage and flew back to Russia. Putin's first visit to the US in ten years lasted just over five hours.

#TASS has compiled the main information known about the summit at this moment.
Start of summit

The Russian leader's plane landed at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson at 10:54 a.m. local time (6:54 p.m. GMT). The welcoming ceremony on the airfield began at 11:10 a.m. local time (7:10 p.m. GMT).

Before taking the official photo on the airfield in Anchorage, Putin and Trump exchanged a few words. The leaders refrained from communicating with the press and did not answer reporters’ questions.

The summit began with a one-on-one conversation in the US president's Cadillac limousine. Thus, the leaders began communicating face-to-face en route to the main venue of the negotiations.
Three-on-three format

The Russian delegation was the first to arrive at the meeting of the presidents, according to footage published by the Kremlin press service. The closed-door talks in the "three-on-three" format began at 11:26 a.m. (7:26 p.m. GMT). In addition to the heads of state, the Russian side was represented by Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, while the US side was represented by State Secretary Marco Rubio and Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff.

When the journalists entered the room where the leaders were meeting, they began pushing each other to get better seats, a #TASS correspondent reported. When asked to leave the room, the journalists began shouting questions, somewhat surprising the presidents and members of the delegations.

The presidents talked for about three hours, counting from their first brief conversation on the red carpet. Then, Putin and Trump held a joint press conference, during which they summarized the results of the talks.
Spotlight on Ukraine

The situation around Ukraine became one of the central issues of the summit, the Russian president said. He expressed hope that the understanding he reached with Trump would pave the way for peace in Ukraine.

Putin said that he and Trump had "established very good business and trusting relations." "I have every reason to believe that, moving along this path, we can reach the end of the conflict in Ukraine sooner rather than later," he said. Putin noted that Russian-US relations had fallen "to their lowest point since the Cold War" in recent years, and that it was necessary to "rectify the situation, moving from confrontation to dialogue."

Immediately before the start of the summit, a TASS source reported that Putin and Trump would discuss global strategic security and that "in one form or another, the topic of sanctions and their destructiveness" would also be addressed.
"Huge progress"

Trump told reporters at the meeting that the leaders had really made tremendous progress.

"There were many, many points that we agreed on. I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway," the US president said.

He later told a Fox News reporter that he rated the meeting with Putin "a 10 out of 10."
Possible continuation

At the end of his speech summarizing the summit, the Russian president suggested in English that the next meeting be held in Moscow. Trump said this was possible, though he acknowledged that he would be criticized for it.
Restrained media reaction

The American media reacted cautiously to the summit, emphasizing the absence of announced agreements or details about the discussions.

The New York Times believes that Putin delayed the introduction of new sanctions, and Bloomberg noted that, after lengthy discussions, "neither leader provided clear details on their discussion or on where they found common ground." The news agency pointed out that this will intensify anxiety in European capitals and in Kiev.
Putin's latest meetings with US leaders

Putin and Trump last held a full-fledged summit in July 2018 in Helsinki, which lasted more than two hours.

They met briefly on December 1, 2018, on the sidelines of the G20 summit, and their conversation lasted about 15 minutes.

Their last meeting took place on June 28, 2019, at the G20 summit in Osaka. Talks lasted one hour and 20 minutes.

On August 16, 2021, after Trump's first presidential term ended, Putin met with Biden in Geneva. The conversation lasted three and a half hours, including a break.

An Eastern Cape businessman and ANC member might be in hot water for attending the EFF’s anniversary rally and posing for a selfie with party leader Julius Malema in Cape Town last month.

Switzerland has built over 370,000 nuclear bunkers – enough to shelter entire population.

Japan unveils AI-powered human washing machine, a futuristic pod that washes and dries in just 15 minutes.

‘Ridiculous’: How Washington residents view the new troops in town. Wary residents and curious tourists stop to take photos, while inside the elegant Union Station a string trio plays “What a Wonderful World.”

Christian Calhoun, a 26-year-old consultant who was born and raised in the US capital, told AFP that seeing the troops made him “more than disappointed -- I’m furious.”

“It’s a lot of standing around,” he added.

Declaring that Washington is overrun by crime and plagued by homeless people, President Donald Trump has deployed 800 National Guard troops, as well as ordering a federal takeover of the city’s police department.

Over more than an hour on Thursday afternoon, the most that the handful of troops at Union Station interacted with the public was to let a French tourist take a selfie with them.

Larry Janezich, an 81-year-old resident, said he had not seen the troops taking part in “any kind of meaningful action that is dedicated to the prevention of crime.”

Patricia Darby, a 65-year-old retiree, said that the troops “don’t want to be here,” pointing to how some had their faces covered.

Calhoun said he does “feel bad” for them as they wore heavy combat gear as temperatures soared above 90 degrees Fahrenheit (33 Celsius).
‘Fake news’

On his Truth Social platform, Trump this week described Washington as “under siege from thugs and killers,” with higher crime rates than “many of the most violent Third World Countries.”

Residents outside Union Station rejected the apocalyptic image.

“It’s ridiculous, and it really just shows how (Trump) sees the people that live here,” Calhoun said.

“It’s totally false, and obviously promulgated on his media to justify an unwarranted exercise of federal power,” Janezich said.

Gerry Cosgrove, a 62-year-old tourist from the Scottish city of Edinburgh only in Washington for two days, had a simple response when asked about Trump’s portrayal of the city: “To quote a phrase: fake news.”

Trump has also ordered homeless people to “move out” of Washington.

“Where are they going to go?” Darby asked, after fetching a bottle of water for a homeless person in the heat.

Randy Kindle, who volunteers with a protest group in a tent outside Union Station, told AFP he was afraid that homeless people could now end up in confinement or jail “when all they need is help.”

Guadalupe, a homeless man in his late 70s originally from Mexico, told AFP that the troops had asked him to move on Wednesday night.

“They have no manners,” he said in Spanish.

“I almost felt sick” during the interaction, he added.

Calhoun said he had mostly seen the troops outside train stations, adding that he noticed they had “a lot of focus on cannabis use.”

Washington legalized cannabis use on private property in 2015, however it is still prohibited under federal law.

Several residents also raised the cost of deploying the troops in their city.

“It’s a waste of money -- I think D.C. was safe,” Darby said.

#Hezbollah vows to keep arms, says Lebanon’s disarmament plan serves #Israel. Naim Kassem said the government’s decision to remove “the defensive weapons of the resistance, its people and Lebanon during an aggression” facilitates the killing of “resistance fighters and their families and evict them from their land and homes.”

He said the government should have instead “spread its authority and evicted Israel from Lebanon.” Speaking in a televised speech to mark a Shiite religious event, he added “the government is serving the Israeli project.”

Kassem added if the ongoing crisis leads to an internal conflict, the government is to blame. He noted that Hezbollah and its Shiite ally, the Amal movement, did not to ask their supporters to protest in the streets to give way for more discussions. The Amal movement was one of the main armed groups in Lebanon’s 1975-1990 civil war and is now a powerful political party led by Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.

But, he said if a decision is taken to protest in the streets, protesters “will be all over Lebanon and head to the U.S. embassy.” He did not elaborate.

Hezbollah’s weapons have been a major dividing point in Lebanon with some groups that are opposed to Hezbollah saying only the state should be allowed to have arms.

The Lebanese government voted last week for a U.S.-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of the year and implement a ceasefire with Israel.

The small Mediterranean country has been under international pressure to get Hezbollah to lay down its arms since the 14-month war with Israel that ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire in November.

However, the Hezbollah leader said his group will only discuss a national defense strategy over its weapons once Israel withdraws from Lebanon and stops its almost daily airstrikes that have killed scores of Hezbollah members since the war’s end.

“The resistance will not hand over its weapons as the aggression continues and occupation remains,” Kassem said, adding that the group will fight a long battle if needed.

The Israel-Hezbollah war weakened the Iran-backed group and left much of its military and political leadership dead. The war killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon, displaced over 1 million and caused destruction that the World Bank said will cost US$11 billion in reconstruction.

After the war ended, Israeli forces stayed in five overlooking locations inside Lebanon.

Israel has accused Hezbollah of trying to rebuild its military capabilities. Israel’s military has said the five locations in Lebanon provide vantage points or are located across from communities in northern Israel, where about 60,000 Israelis were displaced during the war.

Bassem Mroue, The Associated Press

U.S. State Department targets Online News Act in human rights report. The Online News Act, which requires Meta and Google to compensate news publishers for the use of their content, is cited in a section of the report covering freedom of the press.

“The U.S. is determined to crush two important pieces of Canadian legislation, the Online News Act and the Online Streaming Act. Their end game is clear,” said Fen Hampson, an international affairs professor at Carleton University.

While Meta pulled news from its platforms in response to the 2023 law, news outlets are now receiving payments from a $100-million Google fund. Prime Minister Mark Carney indicated last week he is open to repealing the legislation; a government spokesperson said “implementation of the Online News Act is still ongoing” in response to a query from The Canadian Press.

Carney previously killed a digital services tax that would have applied to many large U.S. tech companies after U.S. President Donald Trump halted trade negotiations with Canada over the tax.

Last week, a group of U.S. Republicans urged the Trump administration to push Canada to eliminate the Online Streaming Act. That bill forces large streaming companies like Netflix and Amazon to make financial contributions to Canadian content and news.

Hampson said large tech companies oppose both pieces of legislation. “What we’re seeing is not what I would call honest criticism. It’s a calculated campaign to protect Big Tech’s profits,” he said.

“I would say, to put it bluntly, the report takes tiny grains of truth and spins them into a full-blown web of deception and misinformation that is perhaps worthy of George Orwell himself.”

Alfred Hermida, a professor at the University of British Columbia’s journalism school, also referred to the concept of doublethink from Orwell’s famous political dystopian novel, “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”

Hermida said the report takes things “that are actually promoting press freedom, but presenting them in a way as if they’re curtailing press freedom.”

The report said the government “generally” respects the freedom of expression in Canada, though it concluded that “significant curtailments of press freedom remained.”

It cited media funding as part of the reason, including the Online News Act, journalism tax credits and government funding for a local journalism initiative that is administered independently of government.

The State Department took issue with a stream of that initiative that prioritizes the hiring of diverse journalists, including those who are Indigenous, Black, have disabilities or are part of the LGBTQ community. The report claimed that discriminated “against journalists who fell outside of these favoured categories.”

Hermida said media has “by and large has been very white and very male” and the effort to increase diversity is attempting to correct historical harms.

Hermida added it’s “really startling” to see such a politicized report come out of the State Department.

He described it as a “MAGA lens on press freedom in Canada.”

Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press

Melania Trump demands Hunter Biden retract ‘extremely salacious’ Epstein comments

#Hamas has said that it is ready to withdraw its forces from the Gaza Strip if Israel pulls out its troops to agreed places, the Al Arabiya television channel reported, citing its sources.

According to the sources, the Hamas delegation in Cairo has handed over its proposals on a potential Gaza ceasefire deal to the Egyptian mediators. "Hamas expressed readiness to withdraw its forces in exchange for Israel’s pulling out its troops to agreed localities and reiterated its commitment to preserving the lives of hostages," the sources said, adding that Hamas "demanded a written agreement with Israel" that will provide for international guarantees that Israel would drop its Gaza occupation plans and would not resume hostilities.

The sources also said that Egypt is working on a roadmap for a comprehensive agreement on Gaza to be implemented by late August.

Egypt’s Al-Qahera al-Ekhbariya television channel reported on Wednesday, citing a source, that the Hamas delegation met in Cairo with Egypt’s intelligence chief Hassan Rashind to signal its intention to resume the ceasefire talks as soon as possible. According to the source, the consultations in Cairo are focusing on ways for reaching a 60-day ceasefire agreement.

North Korea not going to signal anything to US via Russian president — Kim’s sister .

#Pyongyang doesn’t plan to convey its readiness for talks with the United States via the Russian side at the upcoming Russia-US summit in Alaska, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s sister, deputy head of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea Kim Yo Jong, said.

Earlier, the South Korean media assumed that during the upcoming meeting with US President Donald Trump, Russian leader Vladimir Putin may raise the topic of the situation on the Korean Peninsula and brief the American president on North Korea’s position. In such an event, according to some media outlets, Russia may become a mediator between the US and North Korea instead of South Korea.

"Media of the ROK (South Korea - TASS) made a supposition on August 12 that the DPRK's thoughts may be conveyed to the U.S. side at the Russia-U.S. summit meeting to be held soon. This is a typical proof that the ROK is having a false dream,"

"Why should we send a message to the U.S. side. I would like to remind again the world that is listening to the news of the ROK media spreading false suppositions. We have nothing to do with the U.S.," she stressed. "We are not at all interested in talks that are obsessed with the irreversible past, and there is no more need to explain the reason."

She recalled her earlier statement that "the special personal relations between the top leaders of the DPRK and the U.S. will not be reflected in the policy and that if the U.S. persists with the outdated way of thinking, the meeting between the top leaders will remain only the "hope" of the U.S. side."

The Kremlin press service said on August 12 after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s phone call with North Korean leader Kim Jong UN that among other things the two leaders had discussed Putin’s upcoming talks with US President Donald Trump.